The Pomaks are Slavic-speaking Muslims of the Rhodope mountains, in southern Bulgaria and north-eastern Greece, with further communities in Turkey; linguists class their speech with the Bulgarian dialects. Their communities took shape during the Ottoman centuries, when part of the local population of the Rhodopes adopted Islam. In our model, the Pomak average is 49.9% Anatolian Neolithic farmer, 44.4% steppe, 4.0% Western hunter-gatherer and 1.7% Natufian, with slightly more steppe ancestry than the Bulgarian average (42.4%). Genetics confirms these local roots: the closest modern average is the Bulgarian average itself (distance 0.0094), closer even than the Pomaks of Greece (0.0101), then Bulgarians from Sofia, Moldovans from Stefan Voda and Romanians, with no Anatolian Turkish sample among the ten nearest. On the ancient side, an early medieval South Slavic group from Nustar in Croatia comes first (0.0139), ahead of Avar-period burials in Austria with a South Balkan profile.

  • Largest ancient components in our model: Anatolian Neolithic farmers 49.9%, Steppe herders (Yamnaya) 44.4%, Western hunter-gatherers 4.0%
  • Closest modern population in our data: Bulgarian, distance 0.0094
  • Closest ancient group in our data: Croatia Early Medieval Avar Period Late Nustar (South Slavic Profile), distance 0.0139

This page sums up what the DNA of the Pomak sample tells us about deep origins. It is built from the averaged Global25 (G25) coordinates of individuals sampled in Bulgaria, listed in the G25 sheet as "Pomak_Bulgaria", and it is one of 335 populations in our atlas. An average describes the group as a whole, not any single person in it.

Ancient make-up of the Pomak average

Anatolian Neolithic farmers
49.9%
Steppe herders (Yamnaya)
44.4%
Western hunter-gatherers
4.0%
Natufian hunter-gatherers (Levant)
1.7%

Modelled as a mix of deep ancestral reference populations, the Pomak average comes out as 49.9% Anatolian Neolithic farmers, 44.4% Steppe herders (Yamnaya) and 4.0% Western hunter-gatherers. The Anatolian Neolithic farmers component reflects the Neolithic farmers of Anatolia, who carried agriculture into Europe from about 6500 BC. The Steppe herders (Yamnaya) share (44.4%) reflects the Bronze Age herders of the Pontic-Caspian steppe (Yamnaya and related groups), whose ancestry spread across Europe and into Asia from about 3000 BC.

Smaller traces of Western hunter-gatherers and Natufian hunter-gatherers (Levant) (under 5% each) also appear. At that level they can reflect real minor ancestry, but also simple model noise, so they should not be over-read. The fit is acceptable (fit distance 0.033): treat the proportions as a good approximation rather than exact values. The model draws on West Eurasian ancient genomes, with modern West African and East Asian stand-ins.

Best-matching report
Balkan Frontier – Serbian, Croatian & Balkan Slavic Report

Balkan Frontier – Serbian, Croatian & Balkan Slavic Report

Fit test on the Pomak average: Excellent fit · 88% regional core
See the report · 15€ Check your own DNA first, free

Closest modern populations to Pomak

Ranking every modern population by genetic distance puts Bulgarian first for Pomak, at 0.009, then Pomak (Greece) and Bulgarian (Sofia). Leaving aside the other regional samples listed under the same name in the G25 sheet, the nearest other populations are Bulgarian (0.009), Bulgarian (Sofia) (0.010) and Moldovan (Stefan Voda) (0.011). Even the tenth closest, Romanian (Galati), is only 0.013 away: Pomak belongs to a dense cluster of related populations, so small differences inside that cluster should not be over-interpreted.

#PopulationDistanceCloseness
1 Bulgarian 0.0094 Very close
2 Pomak (Greece) 0.0101 Very close
3 Bulgarian (Sofia) 0.0103 Very close
4 Moldovan (Stefan Voda) 0.0107 Very close
5 Bulgarian (Montana) 0.0114 Very close
6 Romanian (Arges) 0.0118 Very close
7 Romanian 0.0120 Very close
8 Macedonian 0.0122 Very close
9 Pomak (Danubian Plain) 0.0132 Very close
10 Romanian (Galati) 0.0134 Very close

Distances are Euclidean distances between averaged G25 coordinates. On our scale, below 0.025 is very close, below 0.050 close, below 0.080 moderate, and beyond that distant.

Closest ancient populations to Pomak

Looking back in time, the ancient sample that most resembles the Pomak average is Croatia Early Medieval Avar Period Late Nustar (South Slavic Profile) (Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD), at 0.014. Austria Early Medieval Avar Period (South Balkan Profile) and Hungary Early Medieval Conqueror Period (South Slavic Profile) come next. That is a very close match, which suggests strong genetic continuity between those ancient people (or close relatives of theirs) and the modern population. A close ancient match is not proof of direct descent: it means those individuals carried a similar overall mix of ancestry.

#Ancient sample or groupPeriodDistance
1 Croatia Early Medieval Avar Period Late Nustar (South Slavic Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0139
2 Austria Early Medieval Avar Period (South Balkan Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0166
3 Hungary Early Medieval Conqueror Period (South Slavic Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0176
4 Austria Early Medieval Avar Period (South Slavic Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0177
5 Hungary Early Medieval Avar Period Late (South Balkan Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0191
6 Serbia Early Medieval Ravna Kuline (South Slavic Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0191
7 Croatia Early Medieval Old Croat Velim (South Slavic Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0209
8 Hungary Late Antiquity Sarmatian (South Balkan Profile) Late Antiquity, c. 250-600 AD 0.0218
9 Italy Apulia High Medieval Foggia (North Balkans Profile) High Medieval, c. 1000-1300 AD 0.0225
10 Austria Early Medieval Avar Period (North Adriatic Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0234

Ancient DNA from Bulgaria

Our ancient DNA database holds 251 individuals excavated in present-day Bulgaria, dated from about 43,421 BC to 1153 AD. The most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups among them are G2a (19), I2a (19) and R1b (18), and the most frequent mtDNA haplogroups are K1 (28), T2 (28) and H (26). These are people who lived on the same land in the past, not necessarily ancestors of today's Pomak population.

Most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
G2a 19 I0698 I11135 I11270
I2a 19 I2529 PTK001 PTK004
R1b 18 VAR019 VAR008 PTK003
E1b 14 VAR009 VAR018 I19487
J2a 7 YUN026 YUN007 I19456
T1a 6 I0700 I1108 VAR010
C1a 5 I0706 I1296 YUN013
R1a 5 I2215 I1456 I2163

Most frequent mtDNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
K1 28 I0706 I1298 VAR027
T2 28 I2215 I0704 I0700
H 26 F6-597 I11270 I3879
U5 21 I1296 I1113 VAR010
H1 13 ANI160 VAR022 I2427
H7 9 ANI163 YUN013 I0785
J1 9 I1295 VAR006 SM4
H5 7 I0679 I1297 I6354

Ancient DNA studies on Bulgaria

Browse them in our ancient DNA database: 251 from Bulgaria.

Compare yourself with Pomak

Paste your G25 coordinates (scaled, one line, with or without a name in front) and we compute your genetic distance to the Pomak average and to its closest neighbours, right in your browser. Nothing is uploaded or stored.

No G25 coordinates yet? Get a free simulated G25 from your raw DNA file, or order G25 coordinates.

About these numbers

A word of caution: these figures describe the average of the Pomak individuals who were sampled, not every person who identifies as Pomak. Individuals vary around that average, and identity is about history, language and family, not about a genetic score. Read this page as a map of deep ancestry, not as a definition.

Method: averaged G25 coordinates, Euclidean distances to other modern and ancient averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations (data generated 2026-10-01). Read the full method.

Go deeper than the average

This page describes the Pomak average. Your own DNA has its own story: Balkan Frontier – Serbian, Croatian & Balkan Slavic Report (15€) models your genome against the ancient sources and modern communities of the region, era by era, in a personal PDF report.

A report built for people of Balkan ancestry: ancient regional core (Illyrian, Thracian, Dacian, Paeonian, Scordisci Celtic, Proto-Slavic, Roman-provincial Dalmatia/Moesia/Macedonia, Sarmatian) versus non-regional outside admixture, across...

Frequently asked questions

What is the ancient genetic make-up of Pomak?

Modelled with deep ancestral reference populations, the Pomak average is about 49.9% Anatolian Neolithic farmers, 44.4% Steppe herders (Yamnaya) and 4.0% Western hunter-gatherers. These proportions are model estimates for a group average, not exact values for any one person.

Which populations are genetically closest to Pomak?

Leaving aside other regional samples listed under the same name in the G25 sheet (such as Pomak (Greece)), the closest modern populations to the Pomak average are Bulgarian, Bulgarian (Sofia) and Moldovan (Stefan Voda). The closest ancient matches are Croatia Early Medieval Avar Period Late Nustar (South Slavic Profile), Austria Early Medieval Avar Period (South Balkan Profile) and Hungary Early Medieval Conqueror Period (South Slavic Profile).

Can a DNA test tell me if I am Pomak?

No DNA test can confirm an ethnicity or a nationality. What DNA can show is how similar your genome is to the sampled Pomak average and to its neighbours. If you have G25 coordinates, paste them in the comparison box on this page to check that for free.

Which ExploreYourDNA report suits Pomak ancestry?

For the Pomak average, the regional report to choose is Balkan Frontier – Serbian, Croatian & Balkan Slavic Report, which our fit test rates as an excellent match. Your own DNA may differ from the average, so the free Report Finder checks every report against your file before you buy.

Where does the data on this page come from?

From the averaged Global25 (G25) coordinates of the sampled individuals: genetic distances to other modern and ancient population averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations. The full method is described at https://www.exploreyourdna.com/populations#method.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more

🧭 Find your report
📬 Stay in the loop

New tools and new reports, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.