🧬 UPDATED: DNA Mega-Analysis, new improved version, just €25 Our most complete report, rebuilt into one unified PDF with a real table of contents: Neanderthal %, DNA traits, nutrition, ROH, ancient & modern breakdown, plus a premium AI synthesis.
Discover DNA Mega-Analysis
🎯 Discover our 10 G25 Focus reports One heritage, one deep dive: Thalassa (Mediterranean islands), Am Yisrael (Jewish), Balkan Frontier, Ararat (Levant & Caucasus), Drom (Roma), Sankofa (African diaspora), Raíces (Latin America), El Gringo (USA/Canada), France Profonde & Nordsee (North Sea Germanic).
Browse Focus reports

Study Information

2026
Bulgaria

Abstract

We report genome-wide ancient DNA from 37 individuals retained after conservative archaeological and genomic reassessment of 53 screened samples from two Gothic-period mortuary contexts in present-day Bulgaria: the Aquae Calidae necropolis in Thrace (n = 20; c. 320 CE–375 CE) and the Aul of Khan Omurtag (AKO) in Moesia Secunda (n = 17; c. 350 CE–489 CE). The filtering process excluded individuals with uncertain or probably later-medieval horizon assignment, including a C5-area component linked by READv2 kinship to suspected later-horizon burials. We evaluate three non-exclusive models for Balkan Gothic formation, namely, migration-continuity from northern and Pontic Gothic horizons, a Wenskus–Wolfram–Pohl tradition-bearing cultural–political formation model across changing demographic substrates, and the Roman frontier formation. The two assemblages share Gothic-associated material culture and Christian east–west burial orientation, but they are not a single genome-wide population. Proximal qpAdm models distinguish a southern Anatolian/Marmara-related and northern/Pontic structure at Aquae Calidae from a simpler Chernyakhov-related and Balkan Late Antique structure at AKO. f4 statistics further show that the Anatolian-related component at Aquae Calidae cannot be explained solely as a Chernyakhov-carried signal. DATES places north–south admixture at approximately 12.44 ± 2.36 generations before burial (Z = 5.26), consistent with a pre-burial ancestry mixture rather than a single intact Gothic migration. Kinship is confined within sites. Together, the data reject a single biological Gothic population moving unchanged into the Balkans and instead support a formation process combining migration, multiethnic coalition, and frontier incorporation.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more

🧭 Find your report
📬 Stay in the loop

New tools and new reports, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.