The Paniya live in the Wayanad hills of northern Kerala and the neighbouring parts of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. Their name is usually explained as 'workers', a reminder of their long history as agricultural labourers for local landowners, and they speak Paniya, a Dravidian language close to Malayalam. In our model, the Paniya average is 96.8% South Asian hunter-gatherer related, with tiny Southeast Asian Neolithic (1.9%) and Papuan and Near Oceanian (1.3%) traces. That figure needs care: the component is measured with the Irula, a tribal people of the nearby Nilgiri hills, as a proxy, so it mainly shows that the Paniya are very similar to the Irula, not that they preserve an unmixed ancient population. The closest modern averages are the Adiyan of Kerala (0.0206), Kodava samples with an Adivasi profile, the Kadar and the Malayan, all forest communities of the Western Ghats. No ancient genome comes close (0.1488 for the nearest).

  • Ancient components in our model: South Asian hunter-gatherer related (Irula proxy) 96.8%, Southeast Asian Neolithic farmers 1.9%, Papuan and Near Oceanian 1.3%
  • Closest modern population in our data: Adiyan (Kerala), distance 0.0206
  • Closest ancient group in our data: Andaman Islands 100BP (Great Andamanese), distance 0.1488

Paniya is one of the 335 modern populations in our population genetics atlas. The numbers on this page describe the average Global25 (G25) genome of the Paniya individuals sampled in India (Kerala). Like every population average, it smooths over a lot of variation between individuals.

Ancient make-up of the Paniya average

South Asian hunter-gatherer related (Irula proxy)
96.8%
Southeast Asian Neolithic farmers
1.9%
Papuan and Near Oceanian
1.3%

Modelled with deep ancestral reference populations, the Paniya average is explained almost entirely by South Asian hunter-gatherer related (Irula proxy) (96.8%). The South Asian hunter-gatherer related (Irula proxy) component reflects the deep hunter-gatherer ancestry of South Asia (Ancient Ancestral South Indians). That does not make the population uniform: the model simply has no finer reference population for this part of the world, and the closest populations below show the detail it cannot.

Smaller traces of Southeast Asian Neolithic farmers and Papuan and Near Oceanian (under 5% each) also appear. At that level they can reflect real minor ancestry, but also simple model noise, so they should not be over-read. The fit is loose (fit distance 0.042), which usually means that none of the available reference populations is a close stand-in for part of this ancestry, so read the percentages as rough. This population was modelled with a global set of reference populations (ancient genomes, plus modern stand-ins where no suitable ancient genome exists), because West Eurasian sources alone cannot describe it.

Recommended report
Advanced Ancestry Report

Advanced Ancestry Report

See the report · 16€ Check your own DNA first, free

Closest modern populations to Paniya

Ranking every modern population by genetic distance puts Adiyan (Kerala) first for Paniya, at 0.021, then Kodava (Adivasi Profile) and Kadar. By the tenth closest (Pulliyar) the distance grows to 0.040, a common pattern for a population that shares ancestry with its neighbours while keeping a profile of its own.

#PopulationDistanceCloseness
1 Adiyan (Kerala) 0.0206 Very close
2 Kodava (Adivasi Profile) 0.0285 Close
3 Kadar 0.0311 Close
4 Malayan 0.0330 Close
5 Kurumba 0.0344 Close
6 Gond (Madhya Pradesh) 0.0381 Close
7 Paliyan (Tamil Nadu) 0.0382 Close
8 Halba (Chhattisgarh) 0.0393 Close
9 Nihali 0.0399 Close
10 Pulliyar 0.0402 Close

Distances are Euclidean distances between averaged G25 coordinates. On our scale, below 0.025 is very close, below 0.050 close, below 0.080 moderate, and beyond that distant.

Closest ancient populations to Paniya

If we search ancient DNA for the best match to Paniya, Andaman Islands 100BP (Great Andamanese) (c. 1850 AD) comes first, at 0.149, with Laos Hoabinhian next. Even the best ancient match is distant, so the modern population is better described as a blend of several ancestral sources than as the continuation of one. A close ancient match is not proof of direct descent: it means those individuals carried a similar overall mix of ancestry.

#Ancient sample or groupPeriodDistance
1 Andaman Islands 100BP (Great Andamanese) c. 1850 AD 0.1488
2 Laos Hoabinhian Hoabinhian foragers (pre-Neolithic) 0.1517
3 India Uttarakhand Early Medieval Roopkund c.800CE (South Asian Profile) c. 800 AD 0.1604
4 Malaysia Hoabinhian Hoabinhian foragers (pre-Neolithic) 0.1626
5 China Yunnan EN Xingyi Early Neolithic 0.1860
6 China Heilongjiang EUP Acheng Early Upper Palaeolithic 0.2035
7 Iran EBA Shahr-i-Sokhta (IVC Profile) Early Bronze Age 0.2112
8 China Tianyuan Early Upper Palaeolithic 0.2121
9 Mongolia EUP Salkhit Early Upper Palaeolithic 0.2231
10 Pakistan IA Aligrama Iron Age 0.2241

Ancient DNA from India

Our ancient DNA database holds 59 individuals excavated in present-day India, dated from about 2,350 BC to 1860 AD. The most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups among them are R2a (4), H1a (3) and J2b (3), and the most frequent mtDNA haplogroups are M3 (6), H1 (4) and U2 (4). These are people who lived on the same land in the past, not necessarily ancestors of today's Paniya population.

Most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
R2a 4 I3352 I7036 I6941
H1a 3 I3342 I3407 I2868
J2b 3 I6943 I3351 I6936
R1a 3 I6942 I6946 I3345
E1b 2 I3346 I3404
J2a 2 I3406 I6947
D1a 1 kibber
G2a 1 I3350

Most frequent mtDNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
M3 6 I6943 I3343 I2871
H1 4 I6939 I6936 I3348
U2 4 I6113 I3344 QKT3
HV 3 R21 R23 I6935
M30 3 I6945 I3346 I3406
H12 2 I6937 I3404
J1 2 I6941 I3405
M 2 .. Andaman

Ancient DNA studies on India

Browse them in our ancient DNA database: 59 from India.

Compare yourself with Paniya

Paste your G25 coordinates (scaled, one line, with or without a name in front) and we compute your genetic distance to the Paniya average and to its closest neighbours, right in your browser. Nothing is uploaded or stored.

No G25 coordinates yet? Get a free simulated G25 from your raw DNA file, or order G25 coordinates.

About these numbers

A word of caution: these figures describe the average of the Paniya individuals who were sampled, not every person who identifies as Paniya. Individuals vary around that average, and identity is about history, language and family, not about a genetic score. Read this page as a map of deep ancestry, not as a definition.

Method: averaged G25 coordinates, Euclidean distances to other modern and ancient averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations (data generated 2026-10-01). Read the full method.

Go deeper than the average

This page describes the Paniya average. For your own DNA, Advanced Ancestry Report (16€) gives a full ancestry breakdown with no regional focus, in a personal PDF report.

Comprehensive DNA analysis comparing your genetics to over 2,000 modern reference populations.

Frequently asked questions

What is the ancient genetic make-up of Paniya?

Modelled with deep ancestral reference populations, the Paniya average is about 96.8% South Asian hunter-gatherer related (Irula proxy), 1.9% Southeast Asian Neolithic farmers and 1.3% Papuan and Near Oceanian. These proportions are model estimates for a group average, not exact values for any one person.

Which populations are genetically closest to Paniya?

In the G25 data, the closest modern populations to the Paniya average are Adiyan (Kerala), Kodava (Adivasi Profile) and Kadar. The closest ancient matches are Andaman Islands 100BP (Great Andamanese), Laos Hoabinhian and India Uttarakhand Early Medieval Roopkund c.800CE (South Asian Profile).

Can a DNA test tell me if I am Paniya?

No DNA test can confirm an ethnicity or a nationality. What DNA can show is how similar your genome is to the sampled Paniya average and to its neighbours. If you have G25 coordinates, paste them in the comparison box on this page to check that for free.

Which ExploreYourDNA report suits Paniya ancestry?

Our regional report for this part of the world does not fit the Paniya average closely, so the full Advanced Ancestry Report (no regional focus) is the better choice. The DNA Mega-Analysis adds Neanderthal %, traits and closest ancient populations. The free Report Finder checks every report against your own DNA first.

Where does the data on this page come from?

From the averaged Global25 (G25) coordinates of the sampled individuals: genetic distances to other modern and ancient population averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations. The full method is described at https://www.exploreyourdna.com/populations#method.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more

🧭 Find your report
📬 Stay in the loop

New tools and new reports, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.