The Circassians, who call themselves Adyghe, are one of the native peoples of the north-western Caucasus, and their language, with its eastern form Kabardian, belongs to the North-West Caucasian family alongside Abkhaz and Abaza. After the Russo-Circassian War ended in 1864, most Circassians were expelled or fled to the Ottoman Empire, and large communities live today in Turkey, Jordan and Syria. This page uses a Circassian average from the North Caucasus. In our model, it is 39.0% Caucasus hunter-gatherer, 26.5% Anatolian Neolithic farmer, 21.4% steppe-related, 6.4% East Asian, 5.4% Natufian and 1.3% Iranian Neolithic. The nearest modern averages are Kabardian Circassians (distance 0.0066), the Karachay (0.0088), the Cherkes sample and Balkars, a tight cluster of North Caucasus peoples regardless of language. The closest ancient groups are medieval people from Anapa on the Black Sea coast of the Krasnodar region, from the High Medieval (0.0243) and Khazar periods, in the historic Circassian lands.

  • Largest ancient components in our model: Caucasus hunter-gatherers 39.0%, Anatolian Neolithic farmers 26.5%, Steppe herders (Yamnaya) 21.4%
  • Closest modern population in our data: Circassian (Kabardian), distance 0.0066
  • Closest ancient group in our data: Krasnodar High Medieval Anapa, distance 0.0243

This page sums up what the DNA of the Circassian (Adyghe) sample tells us about deep origins. It is built from the averaged Global25 (G25) coordinates of individuals sampled in Russia (North Caucasus), listed in the G25 sheet as "Circassian", and it is one of 335 populations in our atlas. An average describes the group as a whole, not any single person in it.

Ancient make-up of the Circassian (Adyghe) average

Caucasus hunter-gatherers
39.0%
Anatolian Neolithic farmers
26.5%
Steppe herders (Yamnaya)
21.4%
East Asian
6.4%
Natufian hunter-gatherers (Levant)
5.4%
Iranian Neolithic farmers
1.3%

In a model built from deep ancestral reference populations, the largest share of the Circassian (Adyghe) average, 39.0%, goes to Caucasus hunter-gatherers, ahead of Anatolian Neolithic farmers (26.5%) and Steppe herders (Yamnaya) (21.4%). The Caucasus hunter-gatherers component reflects the hunter-gatherers of the Caucasus, a deep ancestry shared by the Caucasus, Anatolia and the Iranian plateau. The Anatolian Neolithic farmers share (26.5%) reflects the Neolithic farmers of Anatolia, who carried agriculture into Europe from about 6500 BC.

Smaller traces of Iranian Neolithic farmers (under 5%) also appear. At that level they can reflect real minor ancestry, but also simple model noise, so they should not be over-read. The model fits well (fit distance 0.025), so these proportions are a reasonable summary. The model draws on West Eurasian ancient genomes, with modern West African and East Asian stand-ins.

Best-matching report
Ararat – Levant & Caucasus Report

Ararat – Levant & Caucasus Report

Fit test on the Circassian (Adyghe) average: Excellent fit
See the report · 15€ Check your own DNA first, free

Closest modern populations to Circassian (Adyghe)

Among the modern populations in the G25 data, the closest to the Circassian (Adyghe) average is Circassian (Kabardian), at a distance of 0.007 (very close). Next come Karachay at 0.009 and Cherkes at 0.009. Leaving aside the other regional samples listed under the same name in the G25 sheet, the nearest other populations are Karachay (0.009), Cherkes (0.009) and Balkar (0.011). Even the tenth closest, Adygei, is only 0.024 away: Circassian (Adyghe) belongs to a dense cluster of related populations, so small differences inside that cluster should not be over-interpreted.

#PopulationDistanceCloseness
1 Circassian (Kabardian) 0.0066 Very close
2 Karachay 0.0088 Very close
3 Cherkes 0.0090 Very close
4 Balkar 0.0107 Very close
5 Kabardian 0.0112 Very close
6 Abazin 0.0143 Very close
7 Circassian (Adyghe) (other sample set) 0.0204 Very close
8 North Ossetian 0.0218 Very close
9 Ossetian (North Ossetia) 0.0230 Very close
10 Adygei 0.0236 Very close

Distances are Euclidean distances between averaged G25 coordinates. On our scale, below 0.025 is very close, below 0.050 close, below 0.080 moderate, and beyond that distant.

Closest ancient populations to Circassian (Adyghe)

Among ancient genomes, the closest match to the modern Circassian (Adyghe) average is Krasnodar High Medieval Anapa (High Medieval, c. 1000-1300 AD), at 0.024, followed by Krasnodar Early Medieval Khazar Khaganate Anapa and Ukraine Early Medieval Saltovo-Mayaki Verkhnii Saltiv (Alan, Ciscaucasian Profile). That is a very close match, which suggests strong genetic continuity between those ancient people (or close relatives of theirs) and the modern population. A close ancient match is not proof of direct descent: it means those individuals carried a similar overall mix of ancestry.

#Ancient sample or groupPeriodDistance
1 Krasnodar High Medieval Anapa High Medieval, c. 1000-1300 AD 0.0243
2 Krasnodar Early Medieval Khazar Khaganate Anapa Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0288
3 Ukraine Early Medieval Saltovo-Mayaki Verkhnii Saltiv (Alan, Ciscaucasian Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0336
4 Lithuania IA Flat Burials Marvele (Ciscaucasian Profile) Iron Age 0.0357
5 North Ossetia Late Antiquity-Early Medieval Alan Late Antiquity to Early Medieval, c. 250-1000 AD 0.0372
6 Karachay-Cherkessia Late Antiquity-Early Medieval Alan Late Antiquity to Early Medieval, c. 250-1000 AD 0.0376
7 Ukraine IA Scythian Pisochyn (Ciscaucasian Profile) Iron Age 0.0395
8 Ukraine Early Medieval Saltovo-Mayaki Bochkove (Bulgar, Ciscaucasian Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0416
9 North Ossetia Early-Late Medieval Alan Late Medieval, c. 1300-1500 AD 0.0461
10 Armenia IA Lchashen-Metsamor/Urartian Bardzryal Iron Age 0.0477

Ancient DNA from Russia

Our ancient DNA database holds 2,938 individuals excavated in present-day Russia, dated from about 208,050 BC to 1918 AD. The most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups among them are R1a (370), R1b (317) and N1a (235), and the most frequent mtDNA haplogroups are U5 (367), U4 (226) and U2 (150). These are people who lived on the same land in the past, not necessarily ancestors of today's Circassian (Adyghe) population.

Most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
R1a 370 PES001 NEO202 MN2002
R1b 317 MIN5 MN2003 NEO536
N1a 235 Popovskij-1 irk007 DA245
Q1b 184 NEO100 NEO72 I6910
Q1a 77 AfontovaGora2 Kolyma1 I11745
C2a 61 UKY001 I20533 Dzhylinda-1
I2a 61 NEO212 NEO204 I6103
J2a 24 I2055 I2056 I11828

Most frequent mtDNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
U5 367 I8743 Sidelkino MNN007
U4 226 PES001 NEO202 MIN1
U2 150 Kostenki14 Sunghir2 Sunghir3
C4 117 UKY001 I13097 NEO116
D4 113 I20533 I2139 I12695
T2 110 NEO555 KAR001 NEO75
H 92 S1102 A3 KAL2
H2 84 NEO100 I6302 I6403

Ancient DNA studies on Russia

Browse them in our ancient DNA database: 2,938 from Russia.

Compare yourself with Circassian (Adyghe)

Paste your G25 coordinates (scaled, one line, with or without a name in front) and we compute your genetic distance to the Circassian (Adyghe) average and to its closest neighbours, right in your browser. Nothing is uploaded or stored.

No G25 coordinates yet? Get a free simulated G25 from your raw DNA file, or order G25 coordinates.

About these numbers

A word of caution: these figures describe the average of the Circassian (Adyghe) individuals who were sampled, not every person who identifies as Circassian (Adyghe). Individuals vary around that average, and identity is about history, language and family, not about a genetic score. Read this page as a map of deep ancestry, not as a definition.

Method: averaged G25 coordinates, Euclidean distances to other modern and ancient averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations (data generated 2026-10-01). Read the full method.

Go deeper than the average

This page describes the Circassian (Adyghe) average. Your own DNA has its own story: Ararat – Levant & Caucasus Report (15€) models your genome against the ancient sources and modern communities of the region, era by era, in a personal PDF report.

A report built for people of Levant or Caucasus ancestry: ancient regional core (Levant Iron Age, Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer, Kura-Araxes Bronze Age) versus non-regional outside admixture, across 13 communities (Maronite, Druze, Sunni...

Frequently asked questions

What is the ancient genetic make-up of Circassian (Adyghe)?

Modelled with deep ancestral reference populations, the Circassian (Adyghe) average is about 39.0% Caucasus hunter-gatherers, 26.5% Anatolian Neolithic farmers and 21.4% Steppe herders (Yamnaya). These proportions are model estimates for a group average, not exact values for any one person.

Which populations are genetically closest to Circassian (Adyghe)?

Leaving aside other regional samples listed under the same name in the G25 sheet (such as Circassian (Kabardian)), the closest modern populations to the Circassian (Adyghe) average are Karachay, Cherkes and Balkar. The closest ancient matches are Krasnodar High Medieval Anapa, Krasnodar Early Medieval Khazar Khaganate Anapa and Ukraine Early Medieval Saltovo-Mayaki Verkhnii Saltiv (Alan, Ciscaucasian Profile).

Can a DNA test tell me if I am Circassian (Adyghe)?

No DNA test can confirm an ethnicity or a nationality. What DNA can show is how similar your genome is to the sampled Circassian (Adyghe) average and to its neighbours. If you have G25 coordinates, paste them in the comparison box on this page to check that for free.

Which ExploreYourDNA report suits Circassian (Adyghe) ancestry?

For the Circassian (Adyghe) average, the regional report to choose is Ararat – Levant & Caucasus Report, which our fit test rates as an excellent match. Your own DNA may differ from the average, so the free Report Finder checks every report against your file before you buy.

Where does the data on this page come from?

From the averaged Global25 (G25) coordinates of the sampled individuals: genetic distances to other modern and ancient population averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations. The full method is described at https://www.exploreyourdna.com/populations#method.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more

🧭 Find your report
📬 Stay in the loop

New tools and new reports, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.