Tuscany, the land of the ancient Etruscans and later of Renaissance Florence, gave Italy its standard language, which grew out of the Florentine of Dante. Tuscans are also one of the reference populations of the 1000 Genomes Project. Ancient DNA shows that the Etruscans, despite their non-Indo-European language, carried steppe-related ancestry like their Latin neighbours. In our model, the Tuscan average is 59.2% Anatolian Neolithic farmer, 33.2% steppe, 2.7% Western hunter-gatherer, 2.5% Iranian Neolithic and 2.4% Natufian: a middle position between Piedmont in the north (1.4% Natufian) and Marche on the Adriatic side (5.6%). The nearest modern averages are Emilians (distance 0.0108) and Umbrians, then the Italian average from Marche and the Piedmont average. The closest ancient groups are early medieval people with a Central Mediterranean profile from Lombard-period cemeteries in Hungary (0.0103), then Avar-period and Roman Pannonians and High Medieval Christians of Segesta in Sicily.

  • Largest ancient components in our model: Anatolian Neolithic farmers 59.2%, Steppe herders (Yamnaya) 33.2%, Western hunter-gatherers 2.7%
  • Closest modern population in our data: Italian (Emilia), distance 0.0108
  • Closest ancient group in our data: Hungary Early Medieval Lombard Period (Central Med Profile), distance 0.0103

This page sums up what the DNA of the Tuscan sample tells us about deep origins. It is built from the averaged Global25 (G25) coordinates of individuals sampled in Italy, listed in the G25 sheet as "Italian_Tuscany", and it is one of 335 populations in our atlas. An average describes the group as a whole, not any single person in it.

Ancient make-up of the Tuscan average

Anatolian Neolithic farmers
59.2%
Steppe herders (Yamnaya)
33.2%
Western hunter-gatherers
2.7%
Iranian Neolithic farmers
2.5%
Natufian hunter-gatherers (Levant)
2.4%

Modelled as a mix of deep ancestral reference populations, the Tuscan average comes out as 59.2% Anatolian Neolithic farmers, 33.2% Steppe herders (Yamnaya) and 2.7% Western hunter-gatherers. The Anatolian Neolithic farmers component reflects the Neolithic farmers of Anatolia, who carried agriculture into Europe from about 6500 BC. The Steppe herders (Yamnaya) share (33.2%) reflects the Bronze Age herders of the Pontic-Caspian steppe (Yamnaya and related groups), whose ancestry spread across Europe and into Asia from about 3000 BC.

Smaller traces of Western hunter-gatherers, Iranian Neolithic farmers and Natufian hunter-gatherers (Levant) (under 5% each) also appear. At that level they can reflect real minor ancestry, but also simple model noise, so they should not be over-read. The model fits well (fit distance 0.017), so these proportions are a reasonable summary. The model draws on West Eurasian ancient genomes, with modern West African and East Asian stand-ins.

Regional report
Thalassa – Mediterranean Islander Report

Thalassa – Mediterranean Islander Report

Our regional report for this part of the world. Fit test on the Tuscan average: partial, so check your own DNA first.
See the report · 15€ Check your own DNA first, free

Closest modern populations to Tuscan

Ranking every modern population by genetic distance puts Italian (Emilia) first for Tuscan, at 0.011, then Italian (Umbria, Umbrian) and Italian. Leaving aside the other regional samples listed under the same name in the G25 sheet, the nearest other populations are Italian (0.014), Northern Italian (0.016) and Swiss (Italian) (0.019). Even the tenth closest, Greek (Central Greece Phocis), is only 0.025 away: Tuscan belongs to a dense cluster of related populations, so small differences inside that cluster should not be over-interpreted.

#PopulationDistanceCloseness
1 Italian (Emilia) 0.0108 Very close
2 Italian (Umbria, Umbrian) 0.0123 Very close
3 Italian 0.0137 Very close
4 Northern Italian 0.0156 Very close
5 Swiss (Italian) 0.0188 Very close
6 Greek (Thessaly) 0.0189 Very close
7 Vlach Aromanian (Greece) 0.0204 Very close
8 Corsican 0.0205 Very close
9 Albanian Tosk (Cham Greece) 0.0216 Very close
10 Greek (Central Greece Phocis) 0.0254 Close

Distances are Euclidean distances between averaged G25 coordinates. On our scale, below 0.025 is very close, below 0.050 close, below 0.080 moderate, and beyond that distant.

Closest ancient populations to Tuscan

Among ancient genomes, the closest match to the modern Tuscan average is Hungary Early Medieval Lombard Period (Central Med Profile) (Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD), at 0.010, followed by Hungary Late Antiquity-Early Medieval Avar Period (Central Med Profile) and Hungary Late Antiquity Roman (Central Med Profile). That is a very close match, which suggests strong genetic continuity between those ancient people (or close relatives of theirs) and the modern population. A close ancient match is not proof of direct descent: it means those individuals carried a similar overall mix of ancestry.

#Ancient sample or groupPeriodDistance
1 Hungary Early Medieval Lombard Period (Central Med Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0103
2 Hungary Late Antiquity-Early Medieval Avar Period (Central Med Profile) Late Antiquity to Early Medieval, c. 250-1000 AD 0.0125
3 Hungary Late Antiquity Roman (Central Med Profile) Late Antiquity, c. 250-600 AD 0.0136
4 Hungary Early Medieval Avar Period Middle (Central Med Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0137
5 Italy Sicily High Medieval Segesta Christian (Central Med Profile) High Medieval, c. 1000-1300 AD 0.0139
6 Hungary Early Medieval Avar Period (Central Med Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0146
7 Hungary Early Medieval Avar Period Early/Middle (Central Med Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0170
8 Croatia Roman Empire Zadar (Central Med Profile) Roman era, c. 1-400 AD 0.0172
9 Croatia Early Medieval Sipar (Central Med Profile) Early Medieval, c. 500-1000 AD 0.0184
10 Hungary Late Antiquity-Early Medieval Avar Period (Paleo-Balkan Profile) Late Antiquity to Early Medieval, c. 250-1000 AD 0.0187

Ancient DNA from Italy

Our ancient DNA database holds 1,616 individuals excavated in present-day Italy, dated from about 37,855 BC to 1750 AD. The most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups among them are R1b (216), G2a (154) and I2a (59), and the most frequent mtDNA haplogroups are T2 (156), H1 (128) and U5 (121). These are people who lived on the same land in the past, not necessarily ancestors of today's Tuscan population.

Most frequent Y-DNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
R1b 216 Villabruna NOE002 JK2804
G2a 154 NEO834 SLBDS 3126
I2a 59 Mura Tagliente2 RIP001
J2a 48 R17 I16762 3111
J2b 44 ORC003 ORC007 NEO806
E1b 38 I15940 I22118 I17872
J1a 26 VIL007 I22119 I21856
T1a 12 R850 I7218 I7224

Most frequent mtDNA haplogroups

HaplogroupIndividualsExamples
T2 156 NEO834 Mezzo2 Mezzocorona
H1 128 I4062 I4064 NOE001
U5 121 Paglicci71 Villabruna PRD001
H 106 UZZ077 UZZ77 3147
K1 99 R8_Italy UZZ61 I4063
J1 98 NEO695 UZZ075 UZZ75
H2 88 R18 RISE487 Solt63
H5 52 BRC022 BRC013 3120

Ancient DNA studies on Italy

Browse them in our ancient DNA database: 1,616 from Italy.

Compare yourself with Tuscan

Paste your G25 coordinates (scaled, one line, with or without a name in front) and we compute your genetic distance to the Tuscan average and to its closest neighbours, right in your browser. Nothing is uploaded or stored.

No G25 coordinates yet? Get a free simulated G25 from your raw DNA file, or order G25 coordinates.

About these numbers

A word of caution: these figures describe the average of the Tuscan individuals who were sampled, not every person who identifies as Tuscan. Individuals vary around that average, and identity is about history, language and family, not about a genetic score. Read this page as a map of deep ancestry, not as a definition.

Method: averaged G25 coordinates, Euclidean distances to other modern and ancient averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations (data generated 2026-10-01). Read the full method.

Go deeper than the average

This page describes the Tuscan average. Your own DNA has its own story: Thalassa – Mediterranean Islander Report (15€) models your genome against the ancient sources and modern communities of the region, era by era, in a personal PDF report.

A report built for people of Mediterranean-island ancestry: ancient regional core (Minoan, Mycenaean, Nuragic Sardinian, Phoenician, Sicani, Daunian) versus non-regional outside admixture, across 9 communities (Sicilian, Sardinian, Maltese...

Frequently asked questions

What is the ancient genetic make-up of Tuscan?

Modelled with deep ancestral reference populations, the Tuscan average is about 59.2% Anatolian Neolithic farmers, 33.2% Steppe herders (Yamnaya) and 2.7% Western hunter-gatherers. These proportions are model estimates for a group average, not exact values for any one person.

Which populations are genetically closest to Tuscan?

Leaving aside other regional samples listed under the same name in the G25 sheet (such as Italian (Emilia)), the closest modern populations to the Tuscan average are Italian, Northern Italian and Swiss (Italian). The closest ancient matches are Hungary Early Medieval Lombard Period (Central Med Profile), Hungary Late Antiquity-Early Medieval Avar Period (Central Med Profile) and Hungary Late Antiquity Roman (Central Med Profile).

Can a DNA test tell me if I am Tuscan?

No DNA test can confirm an ethnicity or a nationality. What DNA can show is how similar your genome is to the sampled Tuscan average and to its neighbours. If you have G25 coordinates, paste them in the comparison box on this page to check that for free.

Which ExploreYourDNA report suits Tuscan ancestry?

Thalassa – Mediterranean Islander Report is our regional report for this part of the world. On the Tuscan average its fit test reads partial, so check your own DNA first: the free Report Finder runs that test on your file.

Where does the data on this page come from?

From the averaged Global25 (G25) coordinates of the sampled individuals: genetic distances to other modern and ancient population averages, and a non-negative least-squares model against deep ancestral reference populations. The full method is described at https://www.exploreyourdna.com/populations#method.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more

🧭 Find your report
📬 Stay in the loop

New tools and new reports, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.